Bersih 3.0: Siapakah Di Bawah Kereta Polis itu?

Sehingga ke saat ini, masih ada pihak menyebarkan bahawa ada orang yang terperangkap di bawah kereta itu. Lihat sahaja di dua artikel blog ini sebagai contoh: gayapeneroka.blogspot.com dan duniacacamarba.blogspot.com.

Blog Gaya Peneroka menyatakan:

Mereka dilanggar sehinggakan 2 orang daripada mereka cedera parah dan Terperesok di Bawah Kereta Waja Polis, Sebab itu Kereta tersebut di angkat agar 2 orang yang tersepit tadi dapat di keluarkan, tetapi salah seorang dari 2 orang yang cedera parah ini telah Meninggal Dunia sebentar tadi akibat cedera parah di muka,patah tengkok dan sebelah mata.

Manakala blog Dunia Cacamarba pula menyatakan:

Seorang saksi memaklumkan, tindakan penunjuk perasaan terbalikkan kereta peronda polis adalah untuk menyelamatkan seorang gadis yang terperangkap di bawah kereta itu selepas dilanggar

Yang mana satu benar? Seorang atau dua orang?

Selain itu juga, blog ini mendakwa seorang saksi mengatakan pemandu kereta polis tersebut mengamuk kerana kononnya yang melemparkan botol terhadap kereta tersebut adalah Special Branch.

Menurut seorang aktivis dari Terengganu yang menyertai perhimpunan hari ini, kejadian itu berlaku di depan mata beliau berhampiran pasaraya Sogo.

“Ambe (maksudnya saya) petang (tadi) jadi saksi kejadian polis rempuh pendemo. YA! Memang ade provokasi tapi setelah check-check, rupanya yang start lempar botol air mineral kat kereta polis tu adalah Sahabat Bodoh (SB)…!

“Mana tak mengamuk polis tu sampaikan sanggup rempuh dengan laju orang awam di hadapan SOGO.

Huh? Dinturtle, adakah aktivis Terengganu ini boleh dipercayai?

Nasihat OnDaStreet – SUDAH-SUDAHLAH. Hentikanlah cuba memanipulasi sehingga bunyi pun dah seolah tidak masuk akal.

Namun, disebalik spin tak menjadi daripada mereka ini, OnDaStreet masih mahukan kepastian. Kepada mereka yang tahu nama mangsa (atau arwah), sila kongsikan.

Soalan dijalanan: Seorang atau dua orang? Siapa?

Bersih 3.0: Should Be A Sit-In Demonstration Or Not?

Finally, it happened. Bersih 3.0 took place as described would be happening on 28th April 2012. Bersih 3.0 –  a sit-in demonstration, to protest against SPR and electoral forms.

Many things happened and spread out, including false news on a policeman claimed to be beaten to death. Lucky PDRM issued and twitted the news is a false news.

Another “interesting” news is news spreading that a demonstrator dead during Bersih 3.0 demonstration. Only this time, no names and news given as fast as the news spread out like the last time in Bersih 2.0. I hope, those who spread the news verify the news first, to avoid mistaken identity (if the news is true) or it is a false news too.

In regards to incident that happened in front of SOGO, there was also news spreading that a woman died and the “witness” saw the woman was under the police car. Below, a screen shot forwarded to OnDaStreet:

So, was it true?

Let us watch the video footage till the end, shall we?

So, was there anyone under the car? Let us see astill photo of the incident,,

Was there pool of blood if really there is a people under the car?

Hmm.. How come the car was driven in that manner? It was aired in TV, and I think, the footage is already in the middle, and some smart alec shown in towards the end. So, was the car at speed at first? Was the car hit the people first.. or people hit the car first? Let us watch what PDRM give to us…

Ok.. to me, it is people hitting the car. Not to mention JUMPED on the car. Wow.. Lucky a video is being recorded. If a still picture, the story might be different.

After all this yellowish colourful event, maybe, many have forgotten.. was not Bersih 3.0 supposed to be sit-in demonstration? Let us refresh a news:

KUALA LUMPUR: Bersih 2.0 will hold a sit-in protest at Dataran Merdeka from 2pm to 4pm on April 28, its co-chairman Datuk A. Samad Said said here.

The protest, called Bersih 3.0 Duduk Bantah (sit-in protest), will be carried out nationwide and worldwide to register the disappointment over the authorities’ alleged lack of commitment towards electoral reforms.

Samad, who is the co-chairman, said the protest would be a time for reflection for all Malaysians on the kind of legacy and future they want for the next generation.

Meanwhile, group co-chairman Datuk S. Ambiga said the demands were for the Election Commission (EC) to resign, clean up the electoral process and allow international observers to monitor the polls.

Seeking reforms: Samad (centre) flanked by Ambiga and Bersih committee member Hishamuddin Rais at the press conference to announce the protest.

On the Parliamentary Select Committee’s (PSC) report on electoral reforms, she said some of their recommendations were good but they did not look into electoral fraud.

She said election offences and postal voting were not adequately addressed in the report.

Ambiga said the organisers will discuss with the police to ensure that the protest would run smoothly.

“We will be the first to hand anyone who misbehaves to the police,” she said.

Hmm.. ok. What do the portal said? My search shown below:

 

And the result?

Wow!!! Looks like the page is no longer there (at the point of time).

Well, my dear readers, Bersih 3.0 is not a sit-in demonstration at all, not as promised. And I don’t expect Ambiga and friends will hand over those misbehaved to the police.

Well done Bersih 3.0 for promises not fulfilled.

IF it was a sit-in, WOULD the CHAOS happen?

Question on the street: Now all the related parties are more prepared to counter all the spinning by those irresponsible… why still blindly trust one source? Kindly check ALL sources available!!!

BERSIH 3.0: Listen To What @cmlimguaneng Once Said…

Dear pro BERSIH 3.0,

I would like to attract your attention to what Mr Lim Guan Eng once said (Refer to minute to 2:15 until 2.52

What did he say when asked about light and right spectrum of civil societies on their views?

He said:

What we have done is we continously engage civil societies, but I think, you must remember that we finally make the decisions. We obtain inputs from various sectors, but it does not mean that just because we do not listen to you 100%, that means we are wrong.

Then, the moderator asked whether these civil societies can accept that. What did he respond?

Perhaps, they can’t accept that, and I think (for them), we have to listen 100%. So, I would say that we can not be listening to one group all the time, or neither can we afford to listen to one group all the time…

Hmm.. interesting indeed, whereby as a leader of a state, he acknowledge that a government does not necessarily have to listen 100%  to civil societies suggestions and demands.

I know, his statement is in regards to his Penang state matters, but it shows that how certain things and decisions are made after taking into considerations and studies. However, in a way, it also implies to the management of Federal Government and other state goverments.

Focusing on BERSIH 3.0, this campaign is being planned in regards to certain demands that are not met by current ruling government. As explained many times by SPR, the demands are not focused on SPR. For example, bribe is an action by political and non political motives. I’m pretty sure, if you can read the news every day, those reported are not 100% political, and does not limit to Barisan Nasional only.

Even the special committee that have been set up also have considered 18 suggestions out of 22, in which it is a 81% agreeable from all the 22 suggestions, which also included members of Pakatan Rakyat. And in regards to this not 100% fulfullment, listen back to what Mr Lim Guan Eng said in regards to implementing 9 out of 10 suggestion (minute 6:45 to 7:13). Although he blamed and accused these NGOs to be UMNO owned (in which I don’t agreeable to make easy assumptions), what he asked for? He asked for civil society to be rationale.

Same applies to BERSIH 3.0 demands. It is not we do not want better and cleaner elections, but please do it in amicable way.

Please, do not make as if the elections we have so far are so dirty, that Pakatan Rakyat cannot even win few states. If the past elections were so damn dirty, I don’t think Pakatan Rakyat have any chance for more seats in Parliament and controlling few states.

Please be rationale, as what Mr Lim once suggested to civil society based on Penang issues.

 

Question on the street: Should the demand to be fulfilled 100%, and can be considered as the election will be 100% clean? And, how can we consider the past elections where Pakatan Rakyat has won? Those ones are the only clean elections? Where’s your logic and sense?